<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Drug Kennel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.camargoblog.com/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.camargoblog.com</link>
	<description>Drug Development Comments - Focused on 505(b)(2)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:46:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REMS or RiskMAP or what? by REMS for 505(b)(2) products? at Drug Kennel</title>
		<link>http://www.camargoblog.com/index.php/2009/10/29/rems-or-riskmap-or-what/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>REMS for 505(b)(2) products? at Drug Kennel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camargoblog.com/?p=496#comment-326</guid>
		<description>[...] a REMS (Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies — for more information on REMS see a previous posting)? The short answer is: of course it does since REMS affects all applications 505j, 505(b)(1) and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a REMS (Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies — for more information on REMS see a previous posting)? The short answer is: of course it does since REMS affects all applications 505j, 505(b)(1) and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2010 Activity by 2010 505(b)(2) Approvals at Drug Kennel</title>
		<link>http://www.camargoblog.com/index.php/scorecard/2010-activity/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>2010 505(b)(2) Approvals at Drug Kennel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camargoblog.com/?page_id=990#comment-325</guid>
		<description>[...] join everyone else this time of year and develop a list - ours is a list of FDA approvals made under 505(b)(2). As widely reported (WSJ article here) FDA reported that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] join everyone else this time of year and develop a list &#8211; ours is a list of FDA approvals made under 505(b)(2). As widely reported (WSJ article here) FDA reported that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linking Preclinical (Safety), Clinical (Efficacy) and CMC (Quality) Development Activities by Why have a Quality Overall Summary for the Quality Module? at Drug Kennel</title>
		<link>http://www.camargoblog.com/index.php/2009/06/26/linking-preclinical-safety-clinical-efficacy-and-cmc-quality-development-activities/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Why have a Quality Overall Summary for the Quality Module? at Drug Kennel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camargoblog.com/?p=197#comment-324</guid>
		<description>[...] as the backbone of any regulatory submission, an IND or NDA. We have discussed this in a previous blog posting. There is debate about the usefulness of the Quality Overall Summary (QOS or Module 2.3 of eCTD) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as the backbone of any regulatory submission, an IND or NDA. We have discussed this in a previous blog posting. There is debate about the usefulness of the Quality Overall Summary (QOS or Module 2.3 of eCTD) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Generic Approvals Taking Longer by FDA Places Hold on all ANDA PAS &#38; CBE Reviews at Drug Kennel</title>
		<link>http://www.camargoblog.com/index.php/2010/02/20/generic-approvals-taking-longer/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>FDA Places Hold on all ANDA PAS &#38; CBE Reviews at Drug Kennel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camargoblog.com/?p=683#comment-323</guid>
		<description>[...] a blog posting earlier this year, we discussed the then median 26 month ANDA approval time and how it was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a blog posting earlier this year, we discussed the then median 26 month ANDA approval time and how it was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Generic Approvals Taking Longer by Will We Have Generic User Fees? Public Meeting To Be Held. at Drug Kennel</title>
		<link>http://www.camargoblog.com/index.php/2010/02/20/generic-approvals-taking-longer/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Will We Have Generic User Fees? Public Meeting To Be Held. at Drug Kennel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camargoblog.com/?p=683#comment-322</guid>
		<description>[...] for ANDA&#8217;s in the Office of Generic Drugs has steadily gotten worse over the years, with median review times approaching 26 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for ANDA&#8217;s in the Office of Generic Drugs has steadily gotten worse over the years, with median review times approaching 26 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Competition for 505(b)(2) Approvals by Lannettâ€™s Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution: 505(b)(2) or 505j? at Drug Kennel</title>
		<link>http://www.camargoblog.com/index.php/2010/01/13/competition-for-505b2-approvals/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Lannettâ€™s Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution: 505(b)(2) or 505j? at Drug Kennel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camargoblog.com/2010/01/13/competition-for-505b2-approvals/#comment-321</guid>
		<description>[...] have addressed this situation before in this blog. You cannot have two NDA&#8217;s for the same drug [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have addressed this situation before in this blog. You cannot have two NDA&#8217;s for the same drug [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FDA Advisory Committee to Review Acura&#8217;s Oxycodone plus Niacin; Risk/Benefit in Question by Labeling for Abuse-Deterrent Drugs at Drug Kennel</title>
		<link>http://www.camargoblog.com/index.php/2010/04/21/fda-advisory-committee-to-review-acuras-oxycodone-plus-niacin-riskbenefit-in-question/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Labeling for Abuse-Deterrent Drugs at Drug Kennel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camargoblog.com/?p=801#comment-318</guid>
		<description>[...] to get FDA approval (the question of market acceptance is another matter). Thus, a product like we reviewed recently, Acurox®, had three [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to get FDA approval (the question of market acceptance is another matter). Thus, a product like we reviewed recently, Acurox®, had three [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FDA Advisory Committee to Review Acura&#8217;s Oxycodone plus Niacin; Risk/Benefit in Question by Oxycodone + Niacin Voted Down 19-1 at Drug Kennel</title>
		<link>http://www.camargoblog.com/index.php/2010/04/21/fda-advisory-committee-to-review-acuras-oxycodone-plus-niacin-riskbenefit-in-question/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Oxycodone + Niacin Voted Down 19-1 at Drug Kennel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camargoblog.com/?p=801#comment-308</guid>
		<description>[...] September 2007         &#171; FDA Advisory Committee to Review Acura’s Oxycodone plus Niacin; Risk/Benefit in Question [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] September 2007         &laquo; FDA Advisory Committee to Review Acura’s Oxycodone plus Niacin; Risk/Benefit in Question [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Biosimilars &#8211; An introduction by Biosimilars or Biodissimilars? at Drug Kennel</title>
		<link>http://www.camargoblog.com/index.php/2009/09/30/biosimilars-an-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Biosimilars or Biodissimilars? at Drug Kennel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camargoblog.com/?p=354#comment-307</guid>
		<description>[...] On March 19 and 20th the University of Washington School of Pharmacy hosted &#8220;The Biosimilars Conference&#8221;. This conference prompted some interesting discussions. A good background of the current legal status and issues around biosimilars can be found in the September 30th blog &#8220;Biosimilars; an Introduction&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On March 19 and 20th the University of Washington School of Pharmacy hosted &#8220;The Biosimilars Conference&#8221;. This conference prompted some interesting discussions. A good background of the current legal status and issues around biosimilars can be found in the September 30th blog &#8220;Biosimilars; an Introduction&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scorecard by 505(b)(2) Approvals at Drug Kennel</title>
		<link>http://www.camargoblog.com/index.php/scorecard/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>505(b)(2) Approvals at Drug Kennel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camargoblog.com/?page_id=273#comment-306</guid>
		<description>[...] Scorecard      Subscribe  RSS Feed-Posts RSS Feed-Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scorecard      Subscribe  RSS Feed-Posts RSS Feed-Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

